THE SHUTDOWN
Republicans are right (except when wrong)
Our governor insists there must be a compromise in the current budget crisis (Short Takes, July 12). As I have thought about this, it has occurred to me that there is a good parallel in the family budget scenario.
The John Doe family currently lives in a $300,000 house. Mrs. Doe is happy in that house -- it doesn't have an elevator or an indoor swimming pool, but she is proud of it. But Mr. Doe wants a $1 million house. Mrs. Doe finally breaks down and "compromises" on a $650,000 house. She rationalizes cashing in the children's college fund by convincing herself that compromise is always necessary. Mr. Doe isn't satisfied, but knows he can count on another compromise in a couple of years to get the $1 million house by demanding a $1.5 million expenditure.
While I think of myself as more independent than Republican or Democrat, I believe that the Republicans have the best of the budget argument this year. At some point, the Does have to be satisfied with what they have and make the most of it rather than always living beyond their means.
On the other hand, it would be a lot easier to be fully supportive of the Republicans if they would quit trying to legislate morality. Let's fix the state's budget crisis and let individuals, churches and nonprofits deal with the social issues that do not belong in St. Paul.
DEBRA L. ANDERSON, LINDSTROM, MINN.
• • •
What bothers me most about the budget standoff is how vocal Republicans are about refusing to raise taxes when, indeed, they seem very comfortable about raising property taxes for every person living in Minneapolis and St. Paul. Is it because they can push the burden for taxation onto the cities and counties?
I pay more on my modest 1939 home now than do friends with homes twice my size in surrounding suburbs. Why? Because Republicans refuse to take responsibility for the fact that, yes, their policies do result in higher taxes. I guess they just don't want to take the rap for it.