Dayton's first year
Editorial wrongly cited his strong leadership
As a first-term legislator, I view the governor's first-year performance differently than does the Star Tribune Editorial Board ("Dayton's first-year marks are high," Jan. 1).
In 2011, the state's biggest challenge was a $5 billion gap between proposed spending and anticipated revenue. The editorial was right in saying that the governor's tax increase proposal was "simplistic and anticompetitive." Minnesotans and the Legislature thought so, too.
In February, the governor declared that we should pledge not to have a government shutdown. However, he did shut down state government, hoping to pressure the Legislature into voting for a tax increase.
After 20 days, he realized his tax increase wasn't going to occur, so he agreed to a one-time budget increase without raising taxes. The shutdown had been unnecessary.
The newspaper also correctly criticized the governor for his ill-advised child care union power play. Also ill-advised was his plan to hold a special session to resolve the Vikings stadium issue.
A focused leader would have put a Vikings stadium plan together that had the votes of the Legislature and then called a special session.
The governor vetoed 23 bills, twice as many as the previous governor vetoed in four years. His leadership style has been reactionary, not "steady and focused." I hope this changes in 2012.
ROGER CRAWFORD, MORA, MINN.