A Jan. 18 letter writer chides those who are boycotting the inauguration and asks us to respect the process.
Respect the process?
Democracy is not broken, but the process is, and a boycott is called for.
The process is broken when Tea Party Republicans gerrymander districts to ensure that the most far right candidates are elected. It is broken when third-party candidates are restricted from presidential debates. It is broken when Electoral College votes, not those of the people, elect a president. When fake news and tweeted slurs replace facts and real information. When editors of a U.S. newspaper join a murderous tyrant in scolding the people for questioning the legitimacy of a broken election. When people have been suppressed and grievously harmed, the boycott is an action throughout the history of democracy that has made a difference.
The divestment of South Africa made a difference in ending apartheid. The 1955 Montgomery bus boycott made a difference in guaranteeing civil rights and voting for African-Americans. The massive demonstrations against the Vietnam war spoke powerfully that it could no longer be business as usual in the United States.
Usually a strong symbolic ritual of our democracy, the inauguration this time validates this broken election and affirms the words and actions of an unprincipled and unqualified individual. Like the flag, the inauguration ritual by itself is meaningless. It has meaning because of what stands behind it. What stands behind it now? A boycott is called for.
Thank you, U.S. Reps. Keith Ellison, John Lewis and others for your courage of conviction.
Olivia Frey, Northfield
TRUMP'S CABINET
Ballyhoo that independence if you'd like, but I don't trust it
I read with amusement and interest the Jan. 18 editorial about a welcome development in President-elect Donald Trump's allowing disagreement by some of his Cabinet choices.