GUN VIOLENCE
Steps being considered or taken are flawed
New York passed its new laws, and apparently hasn't learned that higher magazine capacities favor the defender. The state has decided to limit magazine capacities on the basis that a murderer might be vulnerable in the two seconds it takes to reload a clip into a gun.
A person who goes out and commits these awful mass murders brings several clips with them. Meanwhile, the person who carries for protection of self or home, not expecting to actually use his or her firearm, usually has as many bullets as one clip can hold.
In the Georgia headlines recently, a mother defended her children against a home invader. She fired all six rounds of her revolver into the intruder at close range, and the attacker still managed to escape the house and drive away. If there had been a second attacker, as there often is, her gun would have been empty. It's because of these situations that a higher magazine capacity favors a defender.
I don't feel that we are even chasing the best course for preventing more violence. As long as we turn a blind eye toward bullies in school, and as long as mental health is ignored, we will continue to see a problem even if there aren't guns.
DOUGLAS VAN DYKE, OAK PARK HEIGHTS
• • •
Imagine if President George W. Bush had issued an executive order stating that citizens no longer had protection from unreasonable search and seizure. No more search warrants required by law enforcement. It would be called an unprecedented attack on the Constitution -- a dictatorial power grab -- and there would be calls for impeachment.
How is what President Obama is considering with executive orders that curtail the Second Amendment ("Obama endorses a broad plan to tighten gun laws," Jan. 15) different?