•••
Francis Wilkinson points our attention to where it should be — on the semiautomatic killing machine that was available to Thomas Matthew Crooks (“Trump shooter’s motive is irrelevant. It’s about guns,” Opinion Exchange, July 16). Let’s reinstate the assault weapon ban to keep such weapons out of the hands of those disturbed enough to point them at a crowd of people. For such disturbed individuals (who often kill themselves or are killed by law enforcement in the process) any crowd will do: at a shopping mall, a concert, a school, a political rally.
Crooks, a registered Republican (though he may have donated $15 to ActBlue three years ago), attempted to assassinate former President Donald Trump. We will never know what went on in his mind. But we know all too well the type of weapon he used. Assault weapons (like the AR-15 style gun he used) are commonly used in mass shootings. Even in a setting where law enforcement was prominent and on alert, the shooter was able to get off enough rounds to kill one individual, critically injure two more and graze Trump’s ear.
Let’s stop posing with assault weapons in Christmas cards (as seems popular among some Republican lawmakers) and instead ban their further sale in our country. Crooks was law-abiding and seemed to those around him to be of sound mind, until he suddenly and violently was not.
Lisa Wersal, Vadnais Heights
•••
A convincing commentary has to use facts and logic to convince others of the argument being made. If it simply expresses strong emotions, it may gain the support of people who feel the same, but it won’t convince anyone to change their mind. Francis Wilkinson’s commentary on gun control (“Trump shooter’s motive is irrelevant. It’s about guns”) won’t convince a single person to change his mind on the subject.