Kevlar shouldn't be the next personal protective equipment. Senators, quit sitting on your hands, respect our doctors and nurses and pass a red-flag bill ("Shooting renews the push at Legislature for gun control," Feb. 11). Health care workers are already taking enough risk treating COVID.
Dr. Thomas Erling Kottke, St. Paul
• • •
This week's shooting in Buffalo struck close to home as I live in Rockford. What a perfect example of the absurdity of our gun laws (or lack thereof). Here we have a guy who told everybody ahead of time exactly what he was going to do and yet as a society we did nothing to stop him ("Suspect envisioned mass shooting in '18," front page, Feb. 10).
Last year an effort to enact red-flag laws was blocked by Republicans in our Legislature. The idea that we can't get proactive and take away weapons from a guy like this boggles the mind. I would suggest that the politicians who are more worried about their re-election or their fear of the National Rifle Association attend the funeral of the woman who was killed.
Paul Hedelson, Rockford
• • •
Gregory Paul Ulrich, the Buffalo shooting suspect, simply fell through the cracks of our social safety net, ignored and avoided at every level of his daily life. Medical disability problems, alcohol and drug addictions, low-income struggles, and personality issues eventually consumed him, culminating in the mass shooting this week. He seemed a broken, lonely old man at the end of his wits, willing to forgo any hope for a better future in mainstream society.
Perhaps it would be good to consider how our humanity failed him: no adequate treatment for his addictions, banned for all but dire medical emergencies from his medical clinic, ostracized from his church community, shunned by most of his neighbors and left out of any form of social service outreach. All this created a monstrous act that might be a lesson for all of us.
Were any addiction treatment programs offered? Were attempts made to adequately treat his medical problems? Did the church community attempt to console him and encourage embracing his faith for help and guidance? Two neighbors did speak well of him, but what of all the others? With so many legal altercations and signs of mental impairment, where were social services to meet his most dire needs? We need to develop awareness of such obvious signs of distress and focus adequate resources to remedy all such situations to love our neighbor as their keeper.
Michael Tillemans, Minneapolis
• • •
We can have micro-arguments about whether there was a mental health evaluation or whether a permit was properly issued or withheld. None of this gets to the larger point: that our society tolerates gun violence at a level exceeding that of most other Western countries combined. We cloak our tolerance in an exaggerated view of what the Second Amendment requires. We remain tolerant of gun violence in the face of overwhelming public opinion to the contrary. How many Sandy Hooks, Parklands and, yes, Buffalo incidents will it take before citizens throw out elected officials who continue to cater to the gun lobby? (Yup, Sen. Warren Limmer, I'm talking about you!)
David J. Therkelsen, Minneapolis
SLAVERY
No recognition of humanity there
I appreciated Aaliyah Hodge's excellent commentary thoroughly debunking Katherine Kersten's attack on the suggested changes to the state's social studies requirements ("Why we need new social studies standards," Opinion Exchange, Feb. 11). Well done! I quibble only with one small, but not insignificant, point. Hodge refers in passing to the infamous decision by the founding fathers to count "enslaved Black people as only partially human." When James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, et. al., determined that the southern states could inflate their population count by three-fifths of the number of their slaves, they did not intend to recognize any fraction of a Black person's humanity. These illustrious founders meant only to grant a favor to slave states, and to encourage them to ratify the new Constitution, by allowing them to increase their representation in the U.S. House (and thus in the Electoral College vote). Black slaves were not thereby granted a human being's right to, say, cast three-fifths of a vote or protect three-fifths of their backs from the lash or forbid the sale of three-fifths of their loved ones to other plantation owners. They had no more human rights than the mules they walked behind in the fields.