VERMILION PARK
In these tough times, it's not an essential
The Star Tribune editorial "Don't abandon plan for Vermilion park" (April 19) strikes at the heart of the dilemma facing our nation today: the inability to determine a want from a need.
We are experiencing record deficits in all levels of government. The Vermilion park plan would take 2,500 acres of additional land off the tax rolls, eliminate future use of this land for all but limited recreation, increase government bureaucracy to maintain the proposed park in perpetuity and, by the way, pay more than the assessed value of the land!
This is where we collectively slap our foreheads. Even the $14 million assessed value of the land to be purchased would go a long way to providing for health care needs of disabled and impoverished children and adults. It would pay for about 291 teachers to help Minnesota schools meet their goal of providing world-class education to every child. It could provide $14 million in restored, perhaps even increased, Local Government Aid to cities that provide basic safety, infrastructure maintenance and repair, and sanitation services to local residents without increasing their property taxes.
We have to ask: Is this a pressing need in challenging times, or simply a desire?
CANDACE OATHOUT, CRYSTAL
THE U.S. SENATE SEAT
How will this appeal differ from all others?
Yes, Norm Coleman has the right to appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court, but what part of the law does he think is on his side? When Coleman has continued to lose several rulings and votes in the contest from the bipartisan panel judges and state Supreme Court rulings in the canvassing board recount, how can he expect to win again with the Supreme Court?
Now, Coleman has received 312 votes less than Al Franken. The 1962 Minnesota governor's race was much closer, as the winner won by only 91 votes, less than a third of this total. The magnanimous Republican loser, Elmer L. Anderson, refused to appeal to the state Supreme Court.
Coleman's equal protection argument is weak. The bipartisan county election officials reexamined all of the 12,000 total rejected absentee ballots, some twice. Each county counted these ballots uniformly per its knowledge of election law. Voters in each county had equal protection.