OFFICER SHOOTING
Obsolete tracking is a recurring problem
The recurring problem of obsolete offender tracking and monitoring isn't unique to Minnesota ("Should alleged cop killers have been free?", May 5). It's cropping up in other states as well, and in more than just probation violation cases. Any probation offender should be made known to law enforcement working on gangs and should be given a high priority, because the case is made and ready to go before a judge.
The fact that only five people are looking for offenders in Minnesota is really a statement that the information is not getting into the hands of those who need it. Similarly, if you look at the state's sex offender registry, you'll find a system based on zip codes similar in some ways to the one in the San Diego area, where an untracked felon killed for the second time.
As technology progresses, these systems should be systematically revamped and updated, lest they become obsolete and incapable of even protecting the protectors themselves.
CURTIS BUTTURFF, ROCHESTER
• • •
I was struck by two stories in the Star Tribune. One described the terrible execution-style killing of an outstanding police officer, committed by two young men who appeared to have no remorse for their abhorrent behavior. The second story focused on the slashing of the Minnesota state budget, targeted at the costs of human services ("Pawlenty to Capitol: Cut $536M or I will," May 5).
How do these stories fit together?
Both killers came from homes where there was child abuse, neglect and chemically dependent parents. These tragic beginnings do not hold the killers blameless. However, if we want to stem the tide of criminal behavior, we have to look at the causes.