RWANDA
Peter Erlinder is wrong about postgenocide era
As someone who has traveled to Rwanda many times following the genocide that occurred in that country in 1994, I find your coverage on Peter Erlinder to be much less than half the story ("The strange case of Peter Erlinder," June 2).
Rwanda has not received the credit it deserves for reestablishing the rule of law in its country following the politically orchestrated genocide of 1994, when more than 800,000 Rwandans were murdered with military precision. The reestablishment of carefully thought out rule of law, based upon its own horrific experience, included the overwhelming task of trying nearly 100,000 capital murder cases in a country about the size of Maryland. So overwhelmed was the justice system that the country reinstituted the traditional Gacaca court system, where people accused of the most heinous of crimes were tried in local communities, with appropriate consequences.
Rwanda most certainly respects the rights of everyone, including the most atrocious perpetrators, to defense counsel. But in Rwanda, as in all countries with the rule of law, one needs authorization by the bar association to represent clients. Erlinder had so little respect for Rwanda's law that he barged in there like he was above it. And then he violated Rwanda's antigenocide laws, which are much like Germany's.
Erlinder shocked genocide survivors and other people such as me, who care deeply about Rwanda, by denying that the genocide ever took place, and by accusing the government as a dictatorial and murderous regime.
I believe it to be in the best interest of Rwanda to release Erlinder, if only to avoid fulfilling his desire for a media circus. But his arrest is certainly understandable given the unique sensitivities and tragic recent history of Rwanda.
WARD BREHM, MINNEAPOLIS
• • •
Thank you for following Peter Erlinder's arrest in Rwanda. It is an important reminder that in the lawless places of the world, lawyers like Erlinder are champions of justice and due process.