HEALTH CARE REFORM
Two retired docs give columnists a checkup
The contrast between the March 28 columns by Nick Coleman ("That reform sure doesn't go very far") and Katherine Kersten ("Obamacare: Part of the elitist plan") was interesting, with differences in tone, style and effect.
Coleman's column had an emotive, evocative tone, using negative stereotypes to ridicule anyone who might oppose universal health care. This was introduced with a single, personal case of his mother, who died of cancer, presumably prematurely for lack of very expensive medicine (although this was not clarified).
Conversely, Kersten's column sustained an historical, logical sequence of the development of the Progressive Movement and its goal to overhaul Americans' lives. The effects of this movement at home and abroad have been deleterious to those it was intended to elevate. It contradicts American principles of individual freedom and responsibility, limited government and free markets.
As a conservative, I acknowledge my bias. I oppose nationalizing any segment of our economy and replacing it with central bureaucratic control, particularly since health care accounts for about one-sixth of the economy. And it would intrude on the patient-doctor relationship.
As a retired physician, I am concerned about the United States, which has the highest-quality health care in the world. There is no case in which the quality of a country's medical care was improved, or even sustained, under nationalized health care. To quote Danny Williams, premier of Newfoundland, who went to Miami to have heart surgery rather than use Canada's socialized health care: "It's my health; it's my choice." But what if there is no longer an America to go to?
J. ROALD FUGELSTAD, Park Rapids, Minn.
As a retired family physician, I have followed the health care debate closely, hoping we finally might start to fix our broken system of health care delivery. People like me were called wealthy doctors by gubernatorial candidate Rep. Tom Emmer, R-Delano, who said in Lori Sturdevant's column ("Health care, a continuing topic? Count on it," March 28) that we should fix the problem by providing free care to the needy. And we were called elitists by columnist Katherine Kersten for even wanting to get affordable health care for everyone.
Mr. Emmer: I'm not wealthy, but I will gladly do free care to the needy if we can send the bill for their $200-a-day chemotherapy to you and Ms. Kersten.