University of Minnesota assistant philosophy Prof. Michael Bennett McNulty's call for a boycott on the game of football, from youth leagues to the NFL (Opinion Exchange, Dec. 27), is the forgivable overreaction of a young academic who lacks knowledge and experience of the game as it once was played by humans of normal size. It is not surprising that collisions among muscular men often weighing more than 350 pounds, with weights approaching that even in high school, might result in brain trauma, not to mention less dramatic long-term injuries to the body. Not surprising, but also not necessary.
As a Division III college lineman in the 1960s, I was larger than average at 225 pounds. Most high school linemen now exceed that weight, while college and professional players dwarf that size. While some may dispute this, I believe that I have retained most of my marbles at age 71, as have virtually all former players of my era with whom I am familiar. We also retain the fondest of memories of playing the best game ever invented from our youth though our college years, with relatively little adverse impact upon our bodies or our minds throughout our adult years.
I have been shocked and saddened by continuous expansion of body sizes populating the game of football during the past 50 years. Certainly, the oversized players risk not only brain damage to themselves and others, but also lifelong issues for their joints, their hearts and the rest of their bodies. Certainly, this unfortunate trend has been driven by the success motive, not by evolution. Spurred on by coaches, parents and, ultimately, owners, boys and men put themselves and others at risk of diminished lives.
A solution, short of abandoning this great game altogether? How about weight limits? Having upper limits of 225 in high school, 250 in college and 275 in the professional game would not realistically exclude any athlete from the game, while it would enable many of more normal size to compete without danger of serious injury. Weight limits have defined the high school and college sport of wrestling for many years. They could easily be incorporated into football, with nothing but salutary impact.
Thomas L. Fabel, Arden Hills
• • •
My suggestion to improve the Minneapolis high school sports financial dilemma ("Budget woes pinching sports in Minneapolis schools," Dec. 28) is to eliminate football. Squads are large and the necessary equipment is expensive. In other words, "Save money, save brains."
Paul Waytz, Minneapolis
HEALTH CARE POLICY
State mandate is a very bad, and very much not conservative, idea
If state Sen. Scott Jensen, R-Chaska, really believes it is a good idea to force consumers to purchase a product they do not want and cannot afford ("Why we should start talking about a state mandate," Dec. 28), then he is in the wrong party. Further, he has learned nothing from the past eight years watching these bad ideas fail nationwide.
Yes, Jensen is correct that conservatives value individual responsibility. But this requires freedom of action — not coercion. Suggesting that a state health care mandate "resonates with conservative principles" is so far off the mark it's no wonder Mitt Romney, who implemented one in Massachusetts, had no credibility on the issue when he ran against President Barack Obama.