TERRORISM
Transparency lacking in Obama administration
I agree with the Obama administration's policy that permits the execution of those who are engaged in operations aimed at killing Americans, even if the targeted individual is a U.S. citizen, and even if this action is more lethal to the individual and bystanders than waterboarding.
I disagree with the administration's policy of nondisclosure of the "rules of engagement," even to members of Congress. These rules had to be leaked to the press, and Congress had to threaten the confirmation of John Brennan as the new CIA director. Only then did the administration hand over the guiding document.
Only after Obama got caught with his hand in the cookie jar did he direct the Justice Department to hand over the document to the Senate Intelligence Committee "as part of the president's ongoing commitment to consult with Congress on national security matters," an administration official said. So much for our "most transparent" president.
ANDY WESTERHAUS, BURNSVILLE
* * *
CULTURAL SENSITIVITY
Cop was silly, but why the outrage over hijab?
I finally saw the picture of the St. Paul policeman wearing the red burqa and Target name tag at a private Halloween party last year ("St. Paul officer in hijab apologizes for photo," Feb. 6). I hadn't seen the shot until the day after all the media reports. I was expecting something obscene and horrible.
Frankly, while it was a bit silly and perhaps tasteless, I thought it really was pretty tame. And I kept wondering why there is no outrage when people wear rosaries as jewelry, or upside-down crucifixes?
Or how about when the Brooklyn Art Museum a few years back displayed a statue of the Virgin Mary made out of elephant dung? In America, I think it is almost part of our culture to degrade and make fun of Christianity. Why is Islam somehow immune?