The Feb. 3 commentary by Heidi Joos ("The Sanders- McGovern comparison explored: Observations for the younger, idealistic members of my party") was spot-on. Except, as a McGovern campaign worker and young idealist back in 1972, I offered her same argument to my twenty-something grandsons, who are as passionate as I was back in the old days. I love seeing these young people so enthused and wish them good luck. Who's to say it won't work this time? I'm just about ready to jump on the bandwagon!
Linda Hove, Isanti, Minn.
• • •
The comparisons between Bernie Sanders and 1972 presidential candidate George McGovern are hollow, if not wholly invalid. There are many major differences between then and now, between that election and the election we face today:
• McGovern was up against a popular incumbent. This time, neither candidate is the incumbent, and Sanders will be up against a candidate from the most divided and fractured Republican Party to date.
• McGovern's follies in vice president selection were unfortunate, but unique to his candidacy alone. Since then we have a far better understanding of and more societal empathy for the mental-health issues that tormented vice presidential candidate Thomas Eagleton, and thereby bedeviled the entire McGovern campaign. That lesson was learned. That "mistake" will not be repeated when Bernie Sanders is nominated.
• The 1972 general election had one of the lowest voter-turnout percentages in history. We can already see that will not be the case this year. Voter turnout is expected to be very high. And when turnout is high, Bernie Sanders consistently wins.
• McGovern's antiwar and pro-civil-rights stances made him a hero with the liberal young voters of 1972. Sanders shares those values and is a hero to the young people of today, but with the disparities between the rich and the poor the worst they have been since the Gilded Age, Sanders' message of economic justice is striking a chord with hardworking middle-class families and senior citizens on both sides of the aisle.