UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
Athletics overall should come under scrutiny
In response to the Feb. 13 Letter of the Day: It's not just Tubby Smith and the University of Minnesota basketball program that have become a major problem for university President Eric Kaler, it's the efficacy of the entire Department of Athletics.
Speaking more as a taxpayer than a U of M alum (which I am -- 1958), I think it's well past time for the governor and Legislature to do a cost-benefit analysis of the athletics program and see if it isn't, as I have contended for years, time either to eliminate it outright (my fondest dream) or (more realistically) scale it back by leaving Big Ten football and basketball and joining a conference more appropriate for an institution whose succession of presidents keep claiming the U is a top research school and whose primary mission purportedly is education.
Those words prove disingenuous season after season, not in the win-loss column but in the mere fact that the athletics department obviously has taken on a life of its own, is not really a part of the entire university any more and has even prompted another recent letter writer to propose the franchising of the U brand, which might bring in more money but which would move the department even further away from the mainstream university.
The newly launched athletics magazine bears out my contention that major reform is needed now.
WILLARD B. SHAPIRA, ROSEVILLE
* * *
GUNS
Merely a fascination, or is there more to it?
In response to "Lost in the debate: Why the fascination with firearms?" (Letter of the Day, Feb. 9): Fascination plays a small roll, if any, in firearm ownership and use. History, feelings, emotions and experiences play larger roles.
To the collector: appreciation of fine craftsmanship, recollection of history and pride of ownership, much as with any other type of collector.