Imagine an unheralded rookie pitcher taking the mound for his major league debut — and pitching a perfect game. Would we expect a repeat every game he starts? No. Would we argue that since he is unlikely to ever match his amazing feat, he should never pitch again? No. Without expecting perfection, we would look forward to watching him pitch, cheer him on, and hope he would enjoy a long, successful career. Harper Lee wrote a perfect book. I cannot imagine her, or anyone else, ever repeating the success of "To Kill a Mockingbird." Yet, I wish she had kept writing. Her other books, although surely imperfect, might have been good. I would have enjoyed reading them, and I look forward ("Surprise 'Mockingbird' sequel," Feb. 4) to "Go Set a Watchman."
David Aquilina, Minneapolis
VACCINATION DEBATE
Autism comes out the worse for wear
The Feb. 8 article "Vaccine skeptics facing a viral blowback" addressed the re-emerging discussion about vaccinations to the detriment of people with autism. Although this article did not argue for or against vaccinations, it dangerously juxtaposed autism with deadly childhood diseases. For example, one parent was described as feeling that nothing compared to autism, including having a child with measles. Leaving the question of vaccination for contagious diseases open to debate due to fear of autism suggests that people with autism have lives so tragic that disease for both themselves and their communities is preferable.
The biggest barrier for people with autism is societal attitudes. Articles such as this perpetuate the idea that people with autism have tragic lives. Having worked with people with autism for 13 years, I know that they have limitless potential. With the proper supports and services they are capable of living fulfilling, productive and meaningful lives. It is imperative that the media works toward changing societal attitudes. It must stop comparing autism to deadly diseases and start positively representing autism. The life of a person with autism is a life worth living.
Ariel Schwartz,
Cambridge, Mass.
• • •
I'm glad the dangers of not vaccinating are getting more attention, but the Feb. 8 story was frustrating. Within the first few sentences the article promoted vaccine skepticism and fear by using the phrase "vaccine horror stories." No, these are not vaccine horror stories. They are just horror stories. This language is leading and implies that vaccines are to blame.
The hypothesis that vaccines cause autism has been refuted over and over again. When will the media stop perpetuating the myth? It is no surprise that the reference to "vaccine horror stories" appeared on the front page, while the fact that the holy grail of the vaccine-autism link — Dr. Andrew Wakefield's sham research — was ultimately debunked and retracted from the medical journal The Lancet was buried on Page A9. It is the equivalent of "if it bleeds, it leads." However, this isn't a crime scene; public health is at stake, and let's keep the sensationalism out of it.
Emily Parker, Minneapolis
The writer is an epidemiologist.
• • •