Thank you to Brian Whiting and Telos Group ("Plans detail a 'destination' Dayton's," Oct. 22, and "Big cost, ambition for Dayton's site," Oct. 24). Too many major city downtowns have lost their historic, beautiful one-of-a-kind department stores. We all bemoaned the loss of Dayton's flagship store on Nicollet Mall. Yes, we were dismayed to lose our city's iconic downtown destination. Knowing that it would become a bland building with no redeeming interior features hurt even more. Remembering the glowing wood flooring, shimmering chandeliers and glittering glass display cases, we knew we lost more than a name on the store.
Reading about the new plans for the site has affected me in a surprising way. Whiting said, "I always say it would be easier to just tear it down and start again, but then you would lose all that history and culture and nostalgia that is what's attracting people."
I realize, as an aging resident of a city I unabashedly love, that I'm proud and hopeful when an aging building gets the respect it deserves.
Andrea Bolger, Minneapolis
The writer is a teacher and guide for Experience the Twin Cities, a local tour company.
EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES
Thrivent lawsuit is concerning: another paradoxical institution?
As a member of Thrivent Financial, I am heartsick to read the Oct. 21 article about Gregory M. Smith ("Black exec says race was factor in Thrivent firing"). It would appear that there is, yet again, an institution we believe has integrity but behind the scenes there lurks the ever-present ugly face of racism.
I go to Nicaragua with my husband on a Habitat for Humanity trip once a year, and this trip is partnered with Thrivent. We wear T-shirts that say "Live Generously" sponsored by Thrivent. Live Generously means to me that we are open not only to give of time and money, but to live with an open heart to all persons, regardless of race, creed, gender identity, culture and economic status.
Our financial adviser has always been kind and gracious to us. But he and we are white.
It is one thing to lay off an employee because he or she is not performing properly. This appears not to be the case with Smith, who was exceeding his goals.