I wanted to thank the Star Tribune for the fifth installment of its "Denied Justice" series — "Rejected by the prosecution" (Oct. 21), which reported that in Minnesota, half of sexual-assault cases that police send to prosecutors never result in charges.
As a victim/survivor of sexual assault myself, that report confirms what I always have believed, even though more women are starting to speak out about their own sexual-assault and misconduct encounters. I also have to admit after reading the heartbreaking stories that were featured, I am now in a place of realization that there is no justice now, nor will there be in the future for victims. If there are cases that involve direct DNA that cannot lead to conviction, then how does that convince any of us to come forward? No one except the victims understand the emotions we go through after a horrendous encounter. The first emotion I had was that it was my fault, and I was too embarrassed to tell anyone. I have had multiple sexual assaults and harassment from men/boys that started at the age of 11 through my adult life. Not once did I move forward with accusations, because I knew then and know now that the burden of proof lies with me. My word over my attacker, who it seems in the scope of things has more rights than I do. It would end up just causing me more pain to report it.
The most disheartening lesson that I have learned after reading those women's stories is what we might be signaling to the men who choose to engage in criminal behavior against women. Men have a green light to attack and harass because the statistics state that only 7 percent of the accused end up being convicted here in Minnesota. If it happens in the workplace, at least women can report to the human resources department, and if women band together, at the very least they could get the person fired. Fired, yes, but convicted, no.
Can we learn anything from these stories and from our own experiences? Will anything ever change for the victims in our society? I think we all know the answer to that, especially after watching the results of Christine Blasey Ford's testimony against now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. Silence may be golden, except to all of us who have endured and survived. Our only recourse is to seek private counseling, confide in our closest family and friends for support, and hopefully not suffer in silence.
Debbie Anthony, Coon Rapids
• • •
Sunday's front-page photo should be framed and hung in Ramsey County Attorney John Choi's office as daily reminder of injustice he gave to a 13-year-old child who had been raped. Two men arrested as their DNA matched samples found on the teenager's underwear. Mr. Choi said she gave "conflicting versions" of what happened, so that made it unlikely they would win at trial. She was a child! She was scared! She was embarrassed! She was traumatized! Not enough evidence? Their matching DNA?? Shame on Choi. Give a jury a chance. That's enough evidence for me to vote a resounding "guilty" if chosen for that case. Review the case again, and this time do the right thing — have the case proceed.
Barbara Nylen, Minneapolis
• • •
I am outraged at the extreme power that prosecutors have over people's lives. It is clear from this article and many others that a prosecutor is really judge and jury and that a prosecutor's decision to prosecute or not is highly subjective. Given that awesome power, no single person should ever be put in that position or allowed to be in that position; rather, there should be a committee of, for example, three to five people who independently judge whether a case is prosecutable. This is just common sense, the same logic that society uses in every other situation where subjective judgment is used: court trials, peer review of scientific articles, beauty contests, lawmaking, etc. Thank you for making that so very clear with this article, another good reason for continuing to read newspapers.