The Dec. 10 article "Panel takes on issue of affordable housing" incites many questions about what Eden Prairie looks like. As an Eden Prairie native, I am excited to see such efforts. While our football dynasty may immediately come to mind, Eden Prairie also holds one of the only gated communities in Minnesota, which may lead one to question how necessary affordable housing is there.
Though the American Community Survey estimates that Eden Prairie has a household median income of more than $95,000, it also estimates that 5.2 percent of individuals fall beneath the federal poverty level. Additionally, the 2010 census cited that more than 20 percent of Eden Prairie's households paid more than 35 percent of their income toward housing; the federal government's standard is 30 percent.
In interviewing staff from Housing and Community Services this fall, I learned that Eden Prairie does not have mandatory inclusionary housing for developers who abstain from subsidies, thus preventing many from creating affordable units. Consequentially, the average family sits on a waiting list for at least two to five years before placement into affordable Section 8 buildings within Eden Prairie, showing that there is certainly an urgent demand.
Taylor Wicklund, St. Peter
MNSCU PLAN
Involve all parties, and the work will progress
Minnesota State Colleges and Universities Chancellor Steven Rosenstone and the MnSCU board of trustees seem to believe that they have a monopoly on the idea of "change." MnSCU overlooks that 8,000 faculty members are perpetually making changes on their campuses to ensure that Minnesota students receive an excellent, accessible and affordable higher education.
No one is out to destroy MnSCU or its strategic plan, Charting the Future. However, the plan's top-down and centralized approach to change allows little autonomy for the diversity of local campuses and communities. What critics are demanding is that the plan's implementation process becomes less administrator-centric and more inclusive of those who are on the front lines of teaching and learning.
The chancellor cannot implement anything without significant buy-in from students, faculty and staff. As witnessed for two months, many of those constituents are not buying what he is selling.
Perhaps it is time for MnSCU to rethink its position. Its leaders should not read resistance to the current autocratic process as indiscriminate resistance to all change.
A potential compromise has been on the table for nine months. A coalition of MnSCU unions and the four-year student association resubmitted that more equitable process again in August. The chancellor has refused to share power with students and faculty.