Gov. Tim Walz, often challenged by Republicans, states he is guided by science and expert medical advice in addressing the pandemic. In that light, Michael Osterholm, who accurately predicted each COVID phase, warned in early February of an impending COVID resurgence, comparing the present lull to the calm preceding a Category 5 hurricane. New COVID lockdowns in Europe serve to reinforce Osterholm's premonitions.
Put schools aside as that environment is a different dynamic, especially with vaccinated teachers. With new COVID variants present, Minnesota, within 60-90 days of mass vaccinations and with billions in business relief available, lowers restrictions and now increases risk, compromises a year of hard sacrifices and only offers a brief respite.
Lowering safeguards is a voluntary decision of choice, not an inescapable measure of last resort. In 60-90 days, we could confidently make the same decisions based on actual data and vaccination levels vs. wistful conjecture today. Claiming we can tighten back down if there is a breakout is delusional as the COVID beast will be out of the cage.
Yet Walz, apparently engaging in "Neanderthal thinking" as cited by President Joe Biden, has decided to lower Minnesota's pandemic restrictions at exactly the wrong time. Should increased hospitalizations and death occur just as success is within grasp, Walz and staff will be responsible.
It seems both political parties are scientifically and pandemically dysfunctional. Either Osterholm is right or Walz. Our health and money, and the lives of many, favor Osterholm.
Tim O'Malley, Plymouth
• • •
Our Minnesota state government is structured with legislative, executive and judicial branches, each having distinct obligations and duties to perform on behalf of the citizens of Minnesota.
Gov. Walz heads up the executive branch and last year declared a state of peacetime emergency, acting quickly during the COVID-19 pandemic. With the effects of the pandemic somewhat remediating, Walz has been gradually lifting protective restrictions.
However, the lifting of restrictions has not been at a pace satisfactory to some legislative members such as Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka, R-East Gull Lake, and state Sen. David Osmek, R-Mound, who want to make the legislators "active partners" with the executive branch, according to the language of the article ("Senate tries to curb Walz powers," March 16).