I'm surprised that the Star Tribune provided such prominent space to the reader advocating for the closing of libraries ("Add libraries to the list," Readers Write, Nov. 27). The very reasons the writer listed for the closing of libraries are why we need to keep them open. Children and adolescents need a place to seek out books to stimulate their minds and indulge their curiosity. Adults need books to get through the upcoming long winter, which includes the ability to pick out something interesting from the shelves rather than waiting for months for their requests to trickle in. Placing books outside during the dark days of January is a poor choice for the only way to obtain library materials. It will all but shut down participation by young people who will be unlikely to go through multiple steps of seeking out book titles online, requesting them and waiting for weeks or months for them to be available.
Closing the libraries because some patrons are not wearing masks correctly or are lingering too long is no reason to deprive all of us of these wonderful and essential services. Compliance problems occur at stores, takeout restaurants and everywhere else, and it is not a reason to shut these places down. We've all learned many skills over the course of the pandemic in how to conduct ourselves. Gently reminding our fellow citizens to adjust their masks rather than simply complaining to overworked employees is not easy, but it is our responsibility.
If Minnesotans don't feel safe going to libraries, they don't need to do so. But closing them at this point in the pandemic would deprive many of us of an important community resource.
Alec Albee, Plymouth
• • •
I am writing in regard to the call for closing the libraries. I live alone, and the shutdown is very difficult. At this time I can't go to friends' houses or the YMCA or do other activities. I am always looking for a safe place to go and see people. And yes, I do go for walks in the nature center.
My library in Austin, Minn., is well run. There is hand sanitizer at the entrance. Everybody I see wears a mask. I don't know how I could stay more than an hour, as the writer said she sees at her library, because there is nowhere to sit down. I rarely require the services of a librarian.
Some seem to like the narrative that people are being irresponsible, but that is not what I see. If the letter writer does not feel safe in her library, she should stay home. However, I will continue my 15-minute, masked visits to the Austin Public Library as long as I can.
Karen Herreid, Austin, Minn.
OIL PIPELINE
A potential compromise on Line 3
Concerning the Line 3 oil pipeline letter "Scientists to Walz: Halt Line 3" (Readers Write, Dec. 3"): Here's something that the two sides of the continuous altercations around Enbridge's Line 3 replacement can build on — and out. Considering the objection to future environmental damage, concerns of Native Americans (and others) of the treatment of their land, eventual alternatives to the need for oil and gas and the short-lived employment surge, I have a solution ...
Agree to allow the Line 3 construction and use to continue but have a stipulation in the agreement that any use of Line 3 will terminate in 10 years or less while its strength to serve without incident can be assured. Also stipulate that at least the portion of the pipeline that crosses Native American land will be removed and the land restored to its original condition and value.