I must disagree with Sen. Amy Klobuchar calling out Justice Clarence Thomas for an ethics violation for his sole dissent to releasing former President Donald Trump's records to a congressional panel investigating the Jan. 6 demonstration that turned violent ("Klobuchar: Texts by justice's wife show high court needs ethics rules," March 28). Current rules of order might need a review, but this is certainly not an appropriate case to pursue or support such action. Some might even interpret her remarks as racist political grandstanding, berating a Black conservative justice's family. Justice Thomas had no financial interest, no bribes, no criminal intent, no ethics violation.
Thomas interpreted the U.S. Constitution in his usual conservative style, utilizing a lifetime of legal study and application, and offered his dissent for protecting confidential information, perhaps deemed executive privilege. Many still believe the 2020 election was unfair, and they had and have every right to offer their opinions — including Ginni Thomas. We are now struggling with a president's 34% approval rating and a stalled Congress of few accomplishments, which will only diminish further as election season gains priority focus.
Finally, imagine every judge, politician, government employee and corporate leader being called out for ethics violations because of their wives' views. Simply ridiculous!
Michael Tillemans, Minneapolis
•••
Chief Justice John Roberts is concerned with the integrity of the Supreme Court. The court has sunk to its lowest approval rating in history. This loss of public respect for the court's ability to sustain justice and democracy is linked to successful attacks on our democratic institutions by those who invest dark money into candidates, politics and policies. This effort to undermine our democracy was dramatized in the Republican-led deadly insurrection on our nation's Capitol on Jan. 6. Unfortunately, Ginni Thomas was part of that process both before, during and after the attack. This included 29 messages Thomas sent to Mark Meadows, White House chief of staff. Thomas has undermined the court's integrity, and more citizens recognize the threats to our commonwealth.
Thomas is an active right-wing lobbyist who manages to bring together dark money and God. No one on the Supreme Court has stood up to protect the court from her overreach or access to political players while her husband makes judicial history. Roberts is responsible for the court's decorum. He has failed to quiet the dark money that speaks through Thomas. This leaves him three choices. Roberts can tell Justice Thomas to resign. He can encourage the House to impeach Justice Thomas for undermining the court's integrity. Or he can ignore the growing corruption of our democracy. Two of these options may restore a sense of institutional integrity. But as we confront war in Europe, an economic recession, our pandemic-eroded teamwork, growing inequality and a climate emergency, this is a poor time to lack leadership and integrity in a critical institution of our democracy.
Bill Mittlefehldt, Duluth