•••
The DFL response to Chris Madel’s gubernatorial launch was both shocking and disappointing (“Mpls. attorney Madel running against Walz,” Nov. 2). The party has long championed fairness, due process and second chances. In recent years, DFL lawmakers have supported meaningful expungement reform, restoring voting rights to tens of thousands of Minnesotans on probation or parole, advanced “ban the box” hiring reforms to help people with records secure employment, backed sentencing reforms intended to reduce unnecessary incarceration and expanded funding for re-entry, mental-health and rehabilitation programs. These efforts reflect a party that has positioned itself as a leader on criminal-justice reform and a defender of the dignity of people touched by the justice system.
That is why the rhetoric in the DFL’s news release was so jarring. It used sweeping language that painted “criminals” as irredeemable and unworthy of representation. Such framing contradicts the values the party has promoted in its legislative work and public commitments.
Equally troubling was the suggestion that an attorney is morally compromised simply for representing an unpopular defendant. The right to counsel is a foundational American principle. John Adams famously defended the British soldiers after the Boston Massacre not because he supported them, but because he believed fairness mattered even when emotions ran high. Defense attorneys safeguard rights that protect every Minnesotan, whether they ever need one or not.
The DFL appears interested in undermining Madel’s conservative chops. Have at it. But don’t do it by questioning the ethics and integrity of the many hardworking criminal-defense attorneys who are among the few who will actually stand next to and up for the very groups the DFL claims to support.
Jill Brisbois, Minneapolis
•••