Dakota County Attorney James Backstrom is looking into civil options to prevent Final Exit Network Inc. from providing suicide advice in Minnesota following a felony conviction and fine for the right-to-die group for assisting an Apple Valley woman's suicide ("Final Exit will pay fine, press on," Aug. 25), and that woman's husband, speaking before a judge, cited the group's "cruel disregard" for the feelings of others, including family members. Why are the feelings of the family more important than the agony of the patient herself?
Any doctor can tell stories of patients put through days or weeks of hell at the end of life because family members are most concerned about their own feelings. After my wife and family had accepted her death from brain cancer and had begun hospice care, one of our banes was well-meaning people who would read about some treatment they had seen on the Internet and would urge: "You have to try it." This only resulted in temporary confusion.
I realize that assisted suicide is different from withholding futile treatment, but we should accept the fact that much of the family's concern is actually a selfish refusal to accept the unpleasant. Perhaps Mr. Backstrom would like to invalidate end-of-life choices in living wills as well.
Edward Stegman, Hastings
• • •
The Final Exit conviction exposes the very real problem faced by terminally ill patients who want to end their suffering. Denied the means to a peaceful end, they resort to desperate measures. In Oregon, individuals like Brittany Maynard, the brain-cancer sufferer who moved there to take advantage of its Death with Dignity law, have options that we Minnesotans do not. We can change the law — not to legitimize suicide, but to allow people like Doreen Dunn to turn to the medical system for compassionate care at the end of life.
Rebecca Thoman, Minneapolis
• • •
For shame, Dakota County Judge Christian Wilton and County Attorney Backstrom for the guilty verdict against Final Exit Network based on speech related to the self-deliverance death of Doreen Dunn. Ms. Dunn was able to die peacefully, by her own free choice, in her own home. This is not against the law.
I question how providing education, information and a compassionate presence result in a conviction of assisting a suicide on the basis of speech alone. The education provided by Final Exit Network does not include "advising or encouraging" anyone to end their life.