When does it end? Since 2007, the University of Minnesota has paid Parker Executive Search at least $285,521 to investigate candidates for prime positions in the athletic department, including Norwood Teague ("U says Teague failed to disclose VCU complaint," Aug 18). The U needs to get back to the basics, post the position needed to be filled, select potential candidates and do its own due diligence when selecting the finalist. The school relies on the taxpayers of Minnesota to operate. It is time for it to stop wasting taxpayer's money on services not needed and start using it on what matters the most: the students.
Keven Henslin, Champlin
• • •
The university recently offered its clerical employees a raise of one-quarter of 1 percent. For me, this translated to 4.1 cents an hour; $1.64 a week; $6.56 a month. When AFSCME rejected the offer (go figure), the administration offered an additional 12.5 percent of 1 percent. For me, 6.2 cents an hour; $2.49 a week; $9.96 a month. A little more for some workers, a little less for others. And this is before taxes, of course. I'm just sayin'.
Lauralee Perdue, St. Paul
SEX STING OPERATIONS
Authorities should focus on the demand, not the supply
I have some sympathy for police officers who are faced with the challenge of determining when a massage crosses the line into prostitution without engaging in sexual activity themselves ("Mpls. cops' sex stings cross the line," Aug. 20). But I have much more sympathy for women who are in most cases coerced into that line of work by abusive pimps, by drug addiction or just to put food on the table, and who risk violence with every transaction.
Why do our law enforcement authorities pursue the supply side of the prostitution equation? Alternatively, arresting buyers and publishing their names targets the actual criminals, and it is much more effective, because it decreases demand. Sweden, Norway, Iceland, Canada and Northern Ireland have passed legislation that criminalizes the buying, but not the selling, of sex. (Minnesota did the same for those under age 16 in the 2011 "Safe Harbor" law.)
A good model comes from Dallas, where police have instituted a diversion program that meets the basic needs of apprehended sex workers and offers treatment as an alternative to jail time. It is time that we in the U.S. begin to understand that prostitutes are victims of crime, not perpetrators.
Jeff Naylor, Minneapolis
PROPERTY TAXES
Toward a fuller understanding of California's Prop 13
Two letters this week about California's Proposition 13 remind me of "The Blind Men and the Elephant," a poem in which the guys who grabbed his tusk and tail described the beast as very much like a spear and a rope. I offer another point of view.
Before Prop 13 passed in 1978, hardworking middle-class people were forced out of their homes because houses that had soared in value were taxed at 3 percent of market value. A $25,000 house purchased in 1960 might be mortgage-free, but its market value of $250,000 required owners to pay an annual tax of $7,500. Retirees living on Social Security would be forced into rentals, because revenue from selling would merely enable them to buy similar houses and pay similar taxes that they could not afford.