East-metro officials quoted in the Aug. 14 article on economic development ("East metro frets as jobs move west") see it as a zero-sum game. Some look for ways to start "fighting" with neighbors to the west over a fixed set of jobs and people. Others wring their hands over being slighted and overlooked, with groups like East Metro Strong stirring the pot to create regional rivalry.
Compare this with the successful strategy adopted by Minneapolis, Bloomington and western neighbors. We see the metro area in an international competition for talent, and we benchmark our success against cities nationally and internationally.
Some examples: Minneapolis made key investments, starting 30 years ago, converting the riverfront from industrial to residential and recreational uses downtown. Bloomington used the Met Stadium/Center parcel to bootstrap its 40-year vision for the South Loop area with the Mall of America development. Edina converted a gravel pit into the Centennial Lakes park, and is now extending that successful model northward to help Southdale adapt to the future. In St. Paul, downtown amenities have created a desirable place for people to live, and the market is responding by converting underutilized commercial space into housing. A similar revitalization process is just starting with the reuse of the Ford parcel.
There's also been a sea change in cooperation between the west-metro governments — just compare the Minneapolis/Bloomington relationship of the 1980s to that of today, or the collaboration between the Chambers of Commerce on the west side.
It's said that you should skate where the puck is going. A good way to do that in the east metro would be to focus more on becoming competitive at a national level, and less on envious comparisons with its neighbors to the west. The region as a whole would benefit.
Steve Peterson, Bloomington
The writer served for 14 years on the Bloomington City Council.
MINIMUM WAGE
There's a Universal Declaration of Human Rights to heed
In an Aug. 14 column, D.J. Tice discussed early studies of the economic impact of minimum-wage increases in Washington state on low-wage workers ("Gains, losses cancel out from Seattle's minimum-wage hike). While such observations are interesting and worthwhile, we also need to have a public discussion about the fact that when employers pay their workers poverty-generating wages, such employers are not only undermining the consumer economy, but are also aiding and abetting in the violation of internationally recognized human rights of their impoverished workers under one or more of Articles 4, 23, 24 and/or 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
That is a declaration that the U.S. played a key role in developing and in getting adopted by the United Nations General Assembly more than 67 years ago, on Dec. 10, 1948. It is also the same declaration that a succession of U.S. presidents and members of Congress have used to rationalize our participation in a succession of costly and bloody undeclared wars since 1948. If those human rights are worth killing and dying for overseas, certainly they must be worthy of respecting and protecting when we establish our minimum-wage policies in our own homeland.