CIVILIAN REVIEW
A lousy process led to a weak overhaul proposal
The process involved in developing the Minneapolis Civilian Review Authority (CRA) restructuring proposal ("Don't dilute citizen review of police," editorial, Aug. 13) was even worse than the substance.
Unlike several previous redesigns of the CRA, this one was conducted entirely in secret. No public involvement, not even from the CRA board itself. In fact, board members were not even told this proposal was in the works. Interestingly, one of the goals of the proposal is increased transparency.
Not a single person currently on the CRA staff has indicated they support it. Even its outgoing manager, Assistant Director of Civil Rights Lee Reid, would not say he supported the proposal.
Reid resigned his position, effective Aug. 14. He has accepted a similar position with the Atlanta Citizen Review Board, whose model is almost identical to the existing CRA in Minneapolis.
This process was a charade, a sham and a fraud.
CHUCK TURCHICK, MINNEAPOLIS
* * *
MACHINISTS
Educators need to rethink training
Regarding Stacy Becker's commentary ["There's magic in machines (magicians needed)," Aug. 14], I couldn't agree more with the unfortunate trend of steering high school students away from machining and manufacturing. Whatever happened to shop class in high school?