I read with great interest the two opposing opinions from former Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak and Katherine Kersten regarding policing in Minnesota and Black Lives Matter ("The moment of truth," Aug. 7). Oftentimes, two sides to an issue are perceived, but in reality there are many more views than just two. Here, we have a clearer line. If you support BLM, you are going with Rybak's view, which could be summed up as "there are lots of videos of black men being shot, so police are racist." Kersten's view states that blacks initiate more contact with police through their own choices to commit crimes; therefore, they have more negative interactions with the police. She backs up her statements with facts.
Folks, I promise you that this issue will never, ever get better if you align with Rybak. Only by acknowledging the facts can we ever hope to make things better. As it is now, Kersten suggests that increased crime and suspicion are a direct result of Rybak's view. We've seen it already, as adoption of lax policing efforts have already resulted in more crime, in Baltimore, Ferguson, Mo., and Minneapolis, as well as any other place BLM has a presence. I honestly don't see how one can deny the numbers. If the supporters of BLM continue to "deny til they die," as one black Ferguson resident stated that her black neighbors do, there can be no progress. My prediction is that some people will read Kersten's opinion, scoff, then continue believing a fiction, then wonder what we can do about policing, then the cycle will start again. Just a big, unbroken circle.
Dan Watts, Northfield
• • •
I believe that the arguments made in Kersten's commentary completely miss the point. It's been suggested many times that blacks are arrested more often because they commit a disproportionate share of crime. But this statement, and the opinion piece as a whole, don't address the true issue.
The most important question we must address is why such a disproportionately high number of blacks in the U.S. are stuck in a social and economic situation where committing crime is more prevalent. The revelation that I've taken away from Black Lives Matter is that, rather than arguing about what it means to seek justice (whatever that means to you), we as a society need to figure out the underlying cause of the racial divide. I believe that the reason we haven't fixed this racial inequality, including the "achievement gap," is that it's a very hard problem. But the answer won't come unless we each do some real soul-searching.
Rather than stating that shootings are justified by statistics that show that one group commits crimes at a higher rate than another, let's look deeper into the underlying racial inequalities. Let's stop arguing our own point of view and ask ourselves what we are doing, or not doing, that perpetuates racism. How am I, a white person who never owned a slave or directed any racist remark at a black person, contributing to this seemingly intractable racial divide?
Chris H. Simon, Minneapolis
• • •
The contrasting perspectives of Rybak and Kersten well reflect America's political dilemma — the evident irreconcilability of political ideologies and agendas.