PUBLIC HOUSING
It's not supposed to be the American Dream
I am not sure what the purpose was of the article about Lucy Mae Hollman ("Waiting her turn for suit's benefits," July 31). As far as I can see, Hollman and her family have been receiving benefits for 20 years. Not sure how that qualifies as "waiting for benefits."
Public housing wasn't designed for and isn't supposed to be the American Dream. The fact that Lucy hasn't achieved her "housing dream" isn't surprising. It isn't meant to be permanent housing: It's meant to be a stop-gap until one can find and fund their own housing.
The American Dream is about funding and owning one's own house where one can live on their own terms. If it takes a "jump start" in the form of a public grant or loan, that's fine as long as eventually the person is off the public dole.
As far as the article states, she has repeatedly violated her housing agreements with unauthorized long-term guests, pets, loud noise, poor housekeeping, not paying rent and other issues. With a very spotty employment record, she is now "retired" at age 53 with depression and disc problems, and she wants to go back to the housing projects where she started from.
Was the point of this article to make us feel sorry for her or to make us angry? As someone who works more than full time and isn't looking for a permanent handout, I know how I feel about it.
ANN GEORGE, SHOREWOOD
* * *
KIDNEY DONORS
It's worth finding out if you can help save a life
Reading the commentary, "If you could give a kidney, would you?" (July 27), provoked an immediate and positive response: Yes I would, because I have! In 1966, a younger brother was in desperate need of a kidney transplant. This was 45 years ago, when transplants were rare and success very uncertain.