BICYCLIST KILLED
Paper's coverage blamed the victim
I was deeply disturbed by the Star Tribune's coverage of the terrible hit-and-run of a bicyclist at Lake Street and Cedar Avenue last weekend. It is very unfortunate that the victim was blamed so severely, both for her legal shortcoming (not having lights) and for failing to use a helmet.
It's great to talk about prevention, but why limit it to the ways in which the victim could prevent the crime? The article might also have mentioned that motorists should not drive drunk, should not flee the scene of an accident, and should be mindful of pedestrians and cyclists at night, especially in an urban area on a weekend.
Similar statements have been made regarding sexual assault: Perhaps the victim was walking alone at night, drinking underage, or wearing revealing clothing. Statements like this have been rightly chastised.
Sean Hayford Oleary, Minneapolis
• • •
The writer of the April 2 Letter of the Day ("Bikers, be safe …") hit the nail on the head. The money spent on bike lanes and trails is a gift.
We have a wonderful bike trail through Deephaven, but too many bikers use the main road that parallels it. Gov. Mark Dayton wants more revenues. Perhaps charging license fees to bikers could supplement the gas tax that pays for our roadways and maintenance.
Janet H. Holmgren, Deephaven
• • •
My deepest condolences to those who knew Elyse Stern. In the discussion of who was at fault — the driver (suspected alcohol) or the biker (no helmet, no lights) — how about more blame to the police departments that allow both scenarios to remain prevalent?