PUBLIC SURVEILLANCE
More government intrusion not welcome
Cameras in and around private business don't concern most citizens, but cameras everywhere in public space are a concern ("Cameras everywhere, and maybe not such a bad thing," April 21).
Let us not forget that the Boston bombing suspects were seen mostly on private security cameras and images given to the FBI by the public via portable video cameras and cellphones. The public got involved for its own safety.
The research offered in the commentary doesn't justify widespread government use of surveillance. In fact, many of us wonder why the government can monitor every move of the citizenry while those same citizens cannot receive a video feed of U.S. Supreme Court proceedings.
CHRIS NERLIEN, St. Paul
• • •
What if the outrage and demand for justice after a terrorist attack were expressed every time a company's negligence and dishonesty caused similar mayhem and loss of life?
CHRIS TREVIS, Lake Elmo
* * *