TAXES
Some further thoughts about what's 'enough'
Taxes are not a perverse fine against the financially successful, although some critics treat them that way (Readers write, April 18).
Taxes are not a punishment; they are not a weapon of class warfare. Taxes are a duty. And in the developed world, they are generally progressive.
At least one of the rationales is that the poor need the support of a social safety net more easily afforded by the well-off. The author of Monday's letter may not be rich, but based on his taxes, his family makes significantly more than the $57,000 of the median Minnesota household.
If the letter writer wants to move somewhere with "lower or no taxes," he could consider Alabama, Mississippi, or Georgia -- states with neither Minnesota winters nor Minnesota-style government services.
Or he could do better and seek out one of the handful of relatively developed countries in the world with lower taxes than the United States, such as Chile (18.2 percent of GDP) or Mexico (17.1 percent), or he could try his luck in a country with an lower ratio, like Oman or Saudi Arabia.
He is right, however, about the proliferation of loopholes and deductions.
The American tax base would be significantly bolstered if the top 400 earners in the country paid closer to their actual income-tax rate ("Super wealthy pay less," April 18), if hedge fund managers' billions were subject to income taxes rather than the meager capital-gains tax, and if U.S. corporations more uniformly paid corporate taxes.
KELLY CARLIN, EAGAN