Not all baby boomers made it to adulthood ("Yes, despite it all, we survived!" Readers Write, April 16). The article to which the letter was responding ("The years of living dangerously" in Variety, April 14) brought back sad, not funny, memories for me. In 1959, my 10-year-old friend Janyne was at the Kenny School playground in southwest Minneapolis on a warm summer day. As her swing came to a stop, her head fell back and hit the concrete underneath her. Janyne walked home, climbed into bed and died within hours of a brain concussion. The rock-hard surface was to blame for her death.
Regarding toys of that era, I myself was lucky to keep my right eye, which was impaled by my brother's jackknife. He was 5 years old. I was 4. We were playing in the garage with no supervision. Mom was inside smoking and chatting on the phone, as housewives did back then.
I could provide an example of harm or even death that resulted from all of the products or practices in the article from personal experience. I have been grateful over the years to see the progress that has been made in protecting children.
Deborah Healey, Tonka Bay
BARWAY COLLINS CASE
An expression of empathy
In every homicide, there are victims in addition to the individual murdered. Yamah Collin's hauntingly sad face pictured on the April 15 front page reminds us of this fact. The horrific killing of her stepson, Barway, and her husband accused — how much can one endure?
Betty Hartnett, Wayzata
STABBING ON THE ST. CROIX
The value of walking away
Flawed thought bears reflection in the face of the senseless killing of Peter Kelly on the St. Croix on Tuesday. One of Kelly's friends was quoted as saying in the April 16 article about the stabbing that "I can say with 150 percent certainty that it wasn't because of something that Pete did." But Kelly's death was related to something he did: He chose to get in his car and drive to continue, in person, an argument that had begun across the water. The unrecognized choice? Walking away from trash-talking, chemically impaired strangers.
M. Leigh Erickson, Minneapolis
AID TO CITIES
Targeting big cities, GOP really targets the middle class
State Republicans' efforts to cut aid to Minnesota's largest cities will not "cut taxes" as they claim ("GOP seeks less aid to big cities," April 16). It will simply redirect the tax burden onto middle-class homeowners while the savings will go to, you guessed it, tax breaks for big business.
I hope that voters (and the Legislature) see through this thinly veiled attempt to enrich the wealthy at the expense of the working class, and I long for the day that the Republican Party stops using dirty tricks to take more money from a working class that has no more to give. This from a party that claims to be a "friend" of the average worker.
Donald Voge, Crystal
• • •