TOM EMMER
He's either on the mark, or all sour grapes
Tom Emmer's commentary made me curious about Gov. Mark Dayton's "tax the rich" fixation ("When will Dayton leave his illusion?" April 12). Our governor is fond of wrapping himself in the flag and saying that he feels undertaxed.
But, by his own method of defining rich -- someone who earns more than $250,000 -- he doesn't qualify. His income taxes showed only $127,000 in taxable income in 2009. So he wasn't really talking about taxing himself.
He was talking about taxing someone else. Like most of his supporters, he feels so strongly about all the spending initiatives before him that he's willing to raise someone else's taxes to achieve them.
Now, that's conviction.
RUSSELL LAST, GOLDEN VALLEY
• • •
Failed gubernatorial candidate Emmer is correct about there being an illusion, but wrong about what that illusion is. To continue to argue that we cannot tax the wealthy because they're the job creators is an absolute illusion that borders on insanity.
Since common sense and a decade of Bush tax cuts have proven that cutting taxes for the wealthy does not create jobs, why not quit hitting our heads against that brick wall and try another approach?