On Thursday, a memorable commentary by retired Minnesota Supreme Court Justice and former NFL great Alan Page appeared in the Star Tribune under the heading: "It is an honor to receive this award, but it's really not about me."
What sticks in my mind is Page's belief that the award was not for himself, but for what he and his wife, Diane, have believed and fought for during their lives: creating educational opportunity and creating equal justice under the law. Page said that part of what he and his wife attempted to do was "trying to be people of good character: being honest, telling the truth, saying what we mean and meaning what we say, treating others with respect and respecting ourselves … ."
Alan Page's acceptance statement is a testament to the greatness of the man and the meaning of the Presidential Medal of Freedom, which he will receive on Friday.
Jeanne Thompson, Plymouth
MARIJUANA LAWS
Legalization would have ill effects? No, that's assuming; seek evidence
A Nov. 15 letter writer bemoaning Minnesota Gov.-elect Tim Walz and his support of recreational marijuana insinuated that young people, specifically, will suffer the consequences. This is an assumption and it is not supported by the available evidence.
In 2014, Colorado became the first state to open recreational marijuana markets and residents there have seen a significant decrease in teen usage of the drug since production and sale of marijuana in the state was regulated and legalized. The National Survey on Drug Use and Health shows among Colorado teens ages 12-17, less than 10 percent used marijuana monthly in 2015 and 2016. That's a whopping 25 percent decrease in adolescent usage from the prior, pre-legalization period.
In Colorado and other states that have legalized weed, there are very serious penalties for selling to minors. It would make absolutely no sense for a highly profitable cannabis business to sell a product to a minor if it meant license suspension or revocation.
In today's political climate, with outright lies and alternative facts, it's crucial that Mr. Walz and his soon-to-be gubernatorial constituencies come to conclusions regarding recreational marijuana based on analogical evidence rather than mere assumptions.
Stephen Monson, Golden Valley
GUN LAWS
Criminals may disregard (thus the nomenclature), but we shouldn't
In response to a Nov. 13 letter under the headline "Criminals using firearms don't care about laws," I would like to offer a few statistics from Scientific American (Nov. 10 issue). Regarding requiring permits to purchase guns, after Missouri repealed such a law in 2007, firearm homicide rates increased by 25 percent (2014 study in the Journal of Urban Health, referenced in this article in Scientific American). Regarding making serious domestic violence offenders surrender their firearms, such a law was found to be associated with a 19 percent reduction in the risk for intimate partner homicide, according to a study by Daniel Webster, director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research Webster, in 2010. Whenever any new law creates a barrier however slight, in gun ownership, violence is reduced up to 30 percent (also Webster).