I can't help but think that perhaps the best way to "Back the Blue" and show our support for the police is to begin trying to reduce the number and availability of guns on the streets. Doesn't that somehow make sense?
The ease with which guns can be acquired, along with their prevalence, must be among the biggest stressors for the officers who we ask to do so much. And those same factors might lead them to believe they will be staring down the barrel of a gun on every call. I can't imagine living with that fear or functioning under that possibility.
Maybe it's time to stop worshiping the false god of a constitutional amendment that is over 200 years old, written in a completely different time, and consider putting the same energy, passion and innovation into preserving human life and common sense.
Keep your guns. I am not advocating taking them all away. I am just asking that, for all those who fly the flags or display the signs about supporting the police, be willing to consider all the ways you could really actually do so that might matter more than just those words.
Liz Malanaphy, Hudson, Wis.
DOLAL IDD
What's justified and what's not
Did the hundreds of peaceful protesters walking in south Minneapolis this past Sunday following the shooting of Dolal Idd watch the same body camera footage as me? Did they see the window fragments spraying outward as Idd fired the first shot after he attempted to flee the gun sting? ("Gun sting led up to shooting by police," front page, Jan. 5.) What events, before or after the video cut released by the Minneapolis Police Department, could possibly make the climax of the video more conclusive?
I fully acknowledge, empathize and support the racial justice movement catalyzed by the killing of George Floyd and the revamping of the Police Department. I understand that institutional trust in the MPD is rightly at an all-time low, so I don't blame those who instinctively question the narrative pushed by such a distrustful institution. However, what else is needed to override this stretched emotional response to an individual provoking the police? Will we ever again perceive these natural progressions in an escalated situation as justified? Do I dare suggest Idd was an alleged arms dealer — a criminal — experiencing the consequences of his life's actions and that he shouldn't be branded a victim? These unfortunate circumstances need to be acknowledged, emotionally digested and responded to independently without the broad brush of systemic racism being uniformly applied and blurring the line between rational and irrational community responses.
Sam Schoephoerster, Circle Pines
• • •
The death of Dolal Idd once again raises questions of disproportional lethal force used against suspects. Are there not better ways to de-escalate and disarm other than a slaughter, with over a dozen rounds fired at Mr. Idd? Methods must change. This is carnage!
Charles Corcoran, Stillwater
JAN. 6 JOINT SESSION
Please rejoin the real world
The upcoming farcical charade on Jan. 6 to challenge the acceptance of the Electoral College count, orchestrated by Sen. Josh Hawley and Rep. Mo Brooks, should make intelligent, patriotic Americans sick to their stomachs. Full-time golfer and part-time president Donald Trump has urged on this seditious behavior and is inciting his followers to act on totally unproven, specious charges. Some Republicans have said they want President-elect Joe Biden to prove there wasn't widespread election fraud. That's like me asking you to prove that you didn't commit the latest Minneapolis bank robbery. It's absurd, isn't it? You can't prove a negative, nor is there any constitutional requirement to do so.