Read the U's full statement about Norwood Teague's resignation, investigation

On Friday, Aug. 14, 2015, the University of Minnesota released a statement titled "Actions and clarifications in the wake of the Teague resignation." The statement from university president Eric Kaler outlines the steps the school has taken to launch an external review of sexual harassment along with its audit of the athletics department. It reads:

Today, we took two important actions in the wake of Norwood Teague's resignation.

First, the University has launched an independent external review. We have retained independent, external legal counsel to review issues related to sexual harassment and the athletics department. And I've asked Board of Regents Chairman Dean Johnson to appoint a member of the Regents to the group overseeing the review.

Karen G. Schanfield, a partner in the law firm Fredrikson & Byron P.A., will lead the review. Ms. Schanfield is a well-regarded employment law expert known for leading many high-profile cases. Ms. Schanfield is a University of Minnesota Law School graduate. Among other matters, Ms. Schanfield has conducted reviews of allegations of sexual harassment and other employment-related claims against several high-level individuals, including the former Adjutant General of the Minnesota National Guard. Ms. Schanfield will work with her law partner, Joseph T. Dixon. Mr. Dixon is a former federal prosecutor who led the U.S. Attorney's prosecution of Tom Petters. Prior to joining Fredrikson & Byron, he served as corporate in-house counsel where he led numerous internal investigations involving allegations of misconduct by high-level executives. Ms. Schanfield and Mr. Dixon will provide a public, written report to the Board and me, consistent with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act.

Secondly, we will conduct a full audit of Intercollegiate Athletics. I have discussed the need for an audit with Legislative Auditor James Nobles, and he has expressed his confidence in University's Associate Vice President of Internal Audits Gail Klatt's independence and ability to conduct a full audit of Intercollegiate Athletics. This was already part of this year's audit plan, approved by the University's Board of Regents Audit Committee in June, and that work will now commence immediately with an initial focus on the information most pertinent to the activities surrounding Teague.

Before I detail the range of these reviews, I want to clarify a few things.

Last Friday, during the news conference announcing Teague's resignation, in response to a question, I said, "I view this as the action of one man who was over served and a series of bad events happened." I regret that very poor choice of words because I cannot state strongly enough that Teague is entirely responsible for his behavior, and alcohol use is no excuse. Sexual harassment will not be tolerated at the University of Minnesota, and his resignation was the appropriate result of his actions.

Now, as to the scope of the independent and external review, we have asked Ms. Schanfield and Mr. Dixon to:

1. Review and investigate all allegations of sexual harassment against Teague or other senior leaders in the athletics department that come in after Teague's resignation.

The independent counsel will review and investigate all allegations of sexual harassment against Teague or other senior leaders in the athletics department that come in from any source following Teague's resignation.

2. Review and address any confidential complaints regarding sexual harassment in the athletics department.

The independent counsel will review all reports that are received through the University's confidential reporting mechanisms regarding sexual harassment in the athletics department to ensure that all reports are appropriately investigated and reviewed.

The independent counsel will interview athletics department senior leadership and others as appropriate to determine whether there were other allegations of sexual harassment by Norwood Teague and, if so, whether the University knew or should have known of them and failed to appropriately respond.

4. Review the University's vetting of Teague during his hiring process.

The independent counsel will assess whether our executive search firm and the institution appropriately checked into Teague's background. This review will involve both interviews and review of all hiring materials and processes.

5. Assess the climate in the athletics department regarding the reporting and addressing of sexual harassment.

The independent counsel will partner with Kimberly Hewitt, the director of our Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action office, to assess whether persons who believe they have experienced sexual harassment related to the athletics department are empowered to report it and whether the reports that are made are appropriately addressed.