Star Tribune
After Charlie Sheen embarrassed both CBS and Warner Brothers with his drinking, drugs, women and attacks on studio executives, the key question was posed not by CNN talk host Piers Morgan, but by Sheen himself: Why didn't they replace me sooner?
The answer, of course, is because he made a lot of money for the network and studio behind "Two and a Half Men."
The revenue rolled in because a lot of people tuned in to watch Sheen, despite his history of bad behavior.
Or was it because of it?
After all, the boundaries were blurred between the real-life and TV good-time Charlies.
Like Sheen, his "Two and a Half Men" alter-ego, Charlie Harper -- boozing, carousing, callous -- is irresponsible. Yet he was irresistible to the average audience of 14.5 million that made the show the small screen's biggest hit sitcom.
Sheen reflects the cold cultural calculus of today's pop-star marketplace: Performers are rewarded or punished based on how far they deviate from our expectation sets.