RandBall: Is violence the thing to save football?

June 3, 2016 at 12:58AM

Author Chuck Klosterman has a new piece in GQ titled, "Will Violence Save Football?" It's a book excerpt, and it's quite good. Any analysis that prompts you to consider a different way of looking at the topic is valuable.

Klosterman lays out an argument with these basic bullet points:

• Football is an unbelievably popular sport, but even people who love football are having a hard time reconciling the violence and related impact on human brains.

• Many people believe that as a result: 1) It will die off, with the brutality eclipsing the beauty and popularity. 2) It will adapt and continue to thrive as a less-violent version of itself.

Both viewpoints make sense. But Klosterman argues there is a third possibility, which exists outside the realm of pure and reasonable solutions — a more primal yet also political split that might happen: football will survive because it is violent, not in spite of it.

Read Michael Rand's blog at startribune.com/randball. michael.rand@startribune.com.

about the writer

about the writer

More from Sports

See More
card image
Christa Lawler/The Minnesota Star Tribune

Thiesse and Korey Dropkin lost to Sweden in the gold medal game, but Thiesse still became the first U.S. woman to medal in curling.

card image
card image