Let's ease into this slow All-Star break week with three disconnected thoughts on baseball:
No-hitters aren't the rare gems they used to be
The wheelhouse for our die-hard baseball fandom was 1984-1989, roughly between the ages of 8 and 13. In the two decades-plus since, we have remained loyal to the sport, but nothing quite approaches those early days — a period that included stretches of sitting for hour after hour looking at baseball cards and adding up yearly statistics of the players (by team).
This is what we did, kids, before the Internet.
But the real point of this is that in those six MLB seasons, there were exactly six no-hitters pitched. It's not a huge sample size for the history of the game — in 1990 alone, for example, there were six no-hitters thrown — so these things do go in cycles.
Still, because that was such a baseball wheelhouse for us, no-hitters felt exceedingly special. And at one per year on average, they were quite rare.
It does not feel that way anymore.
Since the start of the 2010 season, and of course counting Tim Lincecum's no-no on Saturday, there have been 17 no-hitters tossed in the majors. Homer Bailey, a Reds pitcher with great stuff but also a career stat line that looks like Kevin Slowey's, has a pair of them.
No-hitters are nice. They can still be celebrated. But they are not what they once were.