The NBA's decision to try a shortened preseason game on Sunday (11-minute quarters, 44 minutes total) has sparked a broader discussion about the length of the league's season, not the length of the games themselves.
LeBron James and Dirk Nowitzki, who make a massive living playing a game, chimed in to say the schedule is too long, which seems odd since one would imagine they have fun playing basketball and cashing huge checks. Michael Jordan, arguably the greatest player of all time, has responded in an ESPN interview by disagreeing with both players.
It's hard to view this as anything but a generational thing — old school vs. new school — and more specifically Jordan vs. LeBron, with Nowitzki strangely wedged in between them, agewise, but siding with LeBron.
It's probably more nuanced than that; if you asked some retired superstars, they might say a 65-game schedule would have been great. And if you interviewed a bunch of current players, at least some would say they want to play every night — or at least 82 times a year.
Generally speaking, though, the comments from Jordan and LeBron not only fit a convenient narrative but are also probably reflective of similar players from their generations.
Said Jordan: "I love both of those guys, but as an owner who played the game, I loved playing. If I wasn't playing 82 games, I still would've been playing somewhere else because that's the love for the game I had. As a player, I never thought 82 games was an issue."
Amen.
Fans might intermittently gripe about the length of an NBA season, which can seem interminable, but if you really like the NBA are you upset that there are a lot of NBA games? It doesn't make sense.