The Ramsey County attorney's office will not file charges in two more cases of alleged priest sex abuse, bringing to nine the number of cases that have not met the office's standard for prosecution.
County Attorney John Choi's announcement Wednesday coincided with the release of two more lists of accused priests, issued separately by the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis and St. Paul attorney Jeff Anderson, who represents many victims in clergy sex abuse cases.
"As we have said from the very beginning, the facts will lead the way. We can only do what the law allows, and we will do what justice requires," Choi said in a statement.
The two cases involve allegations from 1992 to 1994 at St. John the Baptist Church in New Brighton, and from 1979 to 1984 at the Church of St. Casimir in St. Paul.
The New Brighton case involved a report of abuse made to the archdiocese in 2006 that was closed when the alleged victim did not contact police, according to a memo released by the county attorney's office. The case was reopened in May 2013 when the alleged victim gave police a written statement that he was cornered in the rectory, fondled and forced to perform oral sex. He said the memories came back to him "in a flood."
Nine altar servers at the time of the alleged abuse were questioned by the Ramsey County Sheriff's Office, and none corroborated the allegation. The case was not charged because of lack of proof and the difficulty of proving a case that relies on repressed memories, said the memo by Assistant Ramsey County Attorney Richard Dusterhoft, director of the criminal division.
In the St. Paul case, a man told police in November 2013 that he was sexually abused by two priests starting in 1979 when he was 13. The alleged abuse continued until 1984, said another memo from Dusterhoft.
One of the priests died in 2008. The other priest allegedly fondled the victim through his clothing in 1981, the memo said. The statute of limitations isn't an issue in the case, Dusterhoft wrote, but second-degree criminal sexual conduct cannot be charged because prosecutors can't prove that the victim was under 16 at the time. Dusterhoft also noted that a lesser count couldn't be charged because of a lack of evidence.