MANGANIKA LAKE, MINN. -- Len Anderson grew up eating the fish he caught in the St. Louis River, and he raised his kids to do the same. Now he's teaching his grandchildren to portage canoes in the cold dark of an early morning and wrestle big lunkers of their own.
"It's part of our birthright," said Anderson, who lives in Fond du Lac.
But for the most part, his grandkids can't eat those big fish. They're contaminated with mercury, a toxic air pollutant that falls from the sky, then builds in ever higher concentrations as it moves up the food chain, from microbes to insects to fish -- to people. A recent federal study found that one in 10 infants born on Minnesota's North Shore has potentially unhealthy levels of mercury in their blood, significantly more than those born elsewhere around Lake Superior.
This summer a team of Minnesota scientists, with some funding from the state's taconite industry, have quietly launched a $900,000 research project in an effort to solve an environmental mystery that has puzzled them for years: Why are mercury levels in Minnesota fish among the highest in the Great Lakes region? Why in some cases are they rising? And what, if anything, does 150 years of iron mining have to do with it?
That last question is taking on new urgency as Minnesota gears up for a boom in an altogether different kind of mining -- copper. One of the largest untouched caches of copper in the world lies in northeast Minnesota, and many fear that digging it up will boost water pollution -- including mercury -- as much as it boosts the economy.
As it happens, the sparkling lakes and verdant wetlands that make the Arrowhead region beautiful are also the kind of landscape that is uniquely sensitive to mercury pollution.
Those wet, mucky places are where sulfate, a dissolved mineral that flows from mine pits and waste rock, may play a critical part in the natural alchemy that transports mercury into the chain of life.
"For decades and decades, at an unconscious policy level, we thought that sulfate was pretty benign," said Ed Swain, a leading mercury researcher at the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. "It was viewed as a tolerable tradeoff. But we didn't have all the information laid out in front of us."