We had a chance to talk to Vikings special teams coordinator Mike Priefer for the first time this week about the new rules changes on kickoffs.
NFL owners recently voted to move kickoffs from the 30 to the 35-yard line. Players on the kickoff cover team also can now only line up five yards from the ball, thus limiting their ability to get a running start downfield.
"I'm all for player safety and understand that," said Priefer, who joined coach Leslie Frazier's staff this offseason after coaching Denver's special teams. "I just think anytime you mess with a good thing and that's kickoff, kickoff return – I think it's a wonderful part of our game. Obviously I'm the special teams coach, I'm supposed to say that. But I truly believe that's one of the most exciting plays in our game and I think the changes they made weren't as drastic as I thought they could have been and I'm pretty pleased about that.
"Kicking off from the 35 will help some of the older kickers obviously. It will help the cover teams but you don't get the running start. If you have any familiarity with what I did in Denver, I've got guys looping and crossing and moving. That kind of takes that part of it away. So it will be interesting to see what happens. There will be more touchbacks obviously. But for player safety I think it was the best thing they could do."
Moving kickoffs up five yards will lead to more touchbacks, which could help extend Ryan Longwell's career. The veteran kicker is a free agent, but Priefer certainly sounded like the team wants Longwell back.
"The great thing about Ryan is he's a wily veteran," Priefer said. "He has a lot of tricks in his bag. He's going to have opportunities to place kickoffs where he wants them – higher, shorter, deeper. We'll be able to be creative and do some different things on kickoff and hopefully every now and then he'll get us a few touchbacks. I think it will be good for Ryan."
Priefer said he sees advantages and potential disadvantages in the new rules, but he's happy the owners decided not to eliminate the two-man wedge, which was part of the initial proposal.
"They call it a two-man wedge, it's not a two-man wedge. It's a double team," he said. "To me, it's how you present that. I'm glad they didn't change that. I think you would have a lot of returners who won't want to return the ball if you don't have at least a double team back there protecting them. I'm a big believer in a double team or two double teams. I'm glad that didn't change that part of the rule."