Former Republican Gov. Tim Pawlenty and DFL Gov. Mark Dayton now share one major headache: The vexing politics of sex offender policies.
Finding the right solutions for dealing with the worst sex offenders in the state has long eluded the highest elected official in the land.
The leader this time, Dayton, has been hit hard by rivals for the state's role in potentially moving some civilly committed sex offenders and for not opposing the release of another.
Serial rapist Thomas Duvall, who served his prison term, has long been locked in a state hospital. Duvall's crimes, confessions and fantasies were aired in news reports as he approaches release. Like most of the 700 sex offenders now civilly committed in hospitals, the horrific accounts cause nightmares for politicians and voters alike.
But, the legal thinking goes, grave constitutional questions arise if the state never releases any sex offender from civil commitment after their prison terms, creating de facto life sentences. The state is allowed to keep them locked up only because it promises to be treating them. If no one ever completes treatment, the courts could strike down the whole program.
After enduring a steady bashing for not taking a tougher stand, particularly from Republican gubernatorial contender Kurt Zellers and the state Republican Party, the governor hit back.
Saying "political grandstanding" and gamesmanship were destroying fruitful discussion, he closed the door on support for future release of sex offenders until legislative proposals emerge to fix the befuddling system.
Much of Dayton's experience is reminiscent of the way the issue roiled parts of Pawlenty's term.