Plymouth has dumped controversial plans to change recycling contractors.

Plymouth's City Council retreated from its idea of going with a new recycling provider after hearing from more than a thousand residents.

September 10, 2008 at 3:57PM

Plymouth has dumped controversial plans to change recycling contractors.

Late Tuesday night, the City Council voted to extend its contract with Waste Management, its current recycler, for two years, with the option to extend it to three.

Council members made numerous motions, all of which failed, before Waste Management's director of operations, Steve Metz, came forward at 11:15 p.m. with an option "in the interest of compromise."

He offered a two-year contract. Previously, the company had proposed only a three-year deal. That changed the vote of Council Member Sandy Hewitt, who paused and rubbed her forehead before giving a reluctant "aye." The motion passed 4-3.

In early July, the council voted to negotiate a new recycling contract with Twin Cities-based Eureka Recycling that would have been more expensive but, the city hoped, more innovative than one it now has with Waste Management, the city's recycling provider since the early 1990s.

After Metz sent a letter to all residents warning that a contract with Eureka would force them to do more sorting and pay a higher price, more than 1,200 residents called city officials, and most of them opposed the switch.

In discussing whether to change, council members debated the merits of sorting versus combining recyclables, toured both companies' facilities and weighed whether increased education would improve recycling volume.

The amount the city recycled in tons from 2004 to 2007 dropped by 18.3 percent -- even as the city's population increased. That figure is influenced by several factors, including people recycling less newsprint, both companies said.

Eureka promised that it would boost that number through education, the cost of which it had built into its contract proposal, which was pricier than one with Waste Management.

Waste Management's proposal did not include funds for education, which concerned some council members, who said that for years, they've witnessed a lack of commitment from Waste Management to increase recycling. But others said that perhaps it was the city's responsibility to handle that outreach.

"We want to make recycling as easy, convenient and cost effective" as possible, said Mayor Kelli Slavik, who has consistently supported staying with Waste Management. "I've heard from the residents loud and clear about how that can happen."

Jenna Ross • 612-673-7168

about the writer

about the writer

Jenna Ross

Reporter

Jenna Ross is an arts and culture reporter.

See Moreicon

More from No Section

See More

Peek inside homes for sale in the Twin Cities area.

card image