Schoolchildren in the St. Francis School District learn about plagiarism and the importance of academic honesty starting around fourth grade, said high school junior Derek Schumacher.
So when the student journalist said that when he learned that a school board member in the northern Anoka County district had admitted to lifting a blog post and submitting it as his own column in the Courier, district's monthly newsletter, "It completely shocked me that someone would do that, because they show us that that's wrong. It's taking someone else's idea and just using it for their own."
Last week, the St. Francis school board voted to censure the first-term board member. Matt Rustad made the motion and voted, along with the rest of the board, to censure himself. The move, he said, was his way of "taking responsibility, admitting to a mistake, as opposed to trying to hide it and sweeping it under the rug."
Rustad, 22, of Elk River, said he was doing research for a column for the Courier about paperless classrooms when he found a blog for the International Society for Technology in Education. The original text was a lengthy comment on a blog about paperless schools, written in 2010 by a technology specialist from a New Mexico school district. That item remains online, and is not identical to Rustad's column, but nearly so. Rustad added and removed only a few phrases to the original text.
In the days after the Courier was delivered to residents' homes early last month, the district office received several calls from people who said they had cross-referenced the column with the original blog post.
Rustad said in an interview Wednesday that he had spent little time in traditional schools, and that in home school he hadn't learned much about plagiarism.
He said he didn't view what he did as plagiarism, but that he had hoped readers would know whose work it was by a quote at the end of the column. The quote was from the original author, though readers might believe it was from an interview, not lifted from a blog comment. "I see how it would be viewed as that," he said. "It was ignorance. It was a mistake."
Beyond a mistake