A Texas judge on Wednesday discussed the possibility of a Dec. 1 trial date for Minnesota Vikings running back Adrian Peterson, who, according to his lawyer, wants his child abuse case resolved so he can get back to work.
Peterson sat in the audience with his wife and mother during the brief court hearing in Conroe, Texas, north of Houston. He wasn't asked to enter a plea and did not speak during the hearing, during which lawyers for both sides huddled in front of Montgomery County Judge Kelly Case. Peterson's next hearing date is set for Nov. 14.
After the hearing, Rusty Hardin, Peterson's attorney, told reporters outside the courthouse that his client is "champing at the bit" to respond to the allegations. He called Peterson a "good man," adding, "This is a case about a parenting decision."
Asked how he was feeling, Peterson, swarmed by cameras crews and reporters as he entered a dark Mercedes SUV, responded, "I'm good."
The crush of media inside and outside the courthouse reflected the seemingly insatiable interest in Peterson's story, which has included reports about sloppy financial management at his All-Day Foundation and a 2011 police report about a sex-and-booze party at an Eden Prairie hotel.
Peterson has not personally responded to the criminal charges. He has sent oblique, brief comments from his Twitter account seeming to challenge the accuracy of Star Tribune reports about his foundation that were based on 2011 financial reports, the most recent ones available.
Accompanied by his mother and wife, Peterson wove through the crowd into the courthouse, looking robust and calm in a gray suit with a black tie and white shirt. He sat in the front and didn't speak except for a few hushed conversations with lawyers. Across the aisle from him sat jailed inmates, the men in black and gray striped jail outfits, the women in pink and white. Throughout Peterson's hearing, the inmates' shackles audibly jangled.
In requesting a speedy trial, Hardin said his client is unable to work until the case is resolved. He pushed for a Nov. 18 trial start, which would be exceedingly fast. The judge noted that in Texas, the deadline to complete discovery is a month before a trial starts. The judge said he had two other cases scheduled for that week, and a Dec. 1 date was discussed. Prosecutors said after the hearing that no firm trial date was set. They have previously said the case could take months to go to trial.