The Minnesota politicians I was most eager to interview in the days after the Nov. 6 election weren't the surprise winners, magnetic though some of them surely must be. Rather, I was keen to speak with two veteran members of Congress whose reelections were never in much doubt, yet whose political achievements are considerable — and possibly instructive.
Come January, Rep. Collin Peterson will be the only Democrat representing a greater Minnesota district in the House, and one of the few Democrats from rural districts anywhere in the country.
Meanwhile, Rep. Tom Emmer will be the only Republican in Minnesota's congressional delegation whose district includes territory within the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District. His Sixth District includes most of Anoka, western Carver and northern Washington counties.
While Americans have been rapidly sorting themselves into two geographically defined tribes — one rural, one urban — Peterson and Emmer have been winning against the tide. That ought to make them persons of interest, and not just to us scribblers who think trend-buckers make good copy. Both parties have good reasons to expand their geographic reach.
For Democrats, the incentive springs right out of the U.S. Constitution. The federal government was designed to prevent dominance by the nation's major population centers at the expense of less-populous areas. That design means that Democrats can run up the score in New York and California to control the U.S. House, but they need to win in the heartland, too, to have a shot at controlling the U.S. Senate and taking the White House in 2020.
The reason for Republicans to worry about the growing geographic divide is demographic. The GOP is winning in places that aren't growing, and among voters who are disproportionately older and white. Population trends should tell them that's not a sustainable way to retain power in the long run. The design of the U.S. Senate and the Electoral College can't forever shield them from the Grim Reaper.
But it's one thing for an editorial writer to preach that both parties should be competitive in the whole state, for the good of the whole state. It's another to consider what that would require of the two parties — as both Peterson and Emmer did with me soon after the election.
Peterson — as is his wont — minced no words.