Adrian Peterson's desire to return quickly to the Vikings has ramped up the acrimony between the NFL and the league's players association.
Peterson on Sunday accused the NFL of lying and adopting a "new process of discipline" in its refusal to reinstate the Vikings star running back from the commissioner's exempt list.
Peterson has a scheduled hearing by teleconference Monday after the NFL Players Association filed an expedited grievance in an attempt to get him back on the field as soon as possible.
But a league spokesman, Brian McCarthy, said Peterson was scheduled to meet with league officials Friday to discuss punishment after his court case on a child assault charge was settled and that Peterson declined to attend.
Peterson pleaded no contest two weeks ago to a misdemeanor charge of reckless assault in a case involving him disciplining a 4-year-old son with a wooden switch, a case in which he originally was charged with a felony. He missed nine games, and claims that under terms of an agreement he signed Sept. 16 to go on the exempt list, he would be reinstated once the court case was settled.
Asked about Peterson's possible return after Sunday's 21-13 loss in Chicago, Vikings coach Mike Zimmer said: "That's the furthest thing from my mind right now. I need to figure out how we can tackle and get people out on third downs."
On Sunday, Peterson released a statement through the NFLPA, claiming the pre-discipline hearing wasn't part of the NFL's collective bargaining agreement.
The statement read: "The report that I backed out of a meeting with the NFL is just not true. When [Commissioner] Roger Goodell's office asked that I attend the 'hearing' on Friday, I consulted with my union and learned that this 'hearing' was something new and inconsistent with the CBA. On Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday of this past week, my union sent e-mails, letters, and had conversations with his office on my behalf asking about the nature of the hearing, how it was to occur, who would participate, and its purpose. We repeatedly asked them to respond quickly to my questions because I want to cooperate and get back on the field, but they didn't respond until late Wednesday evening, and even then they didn't answer important questions about their proposed 'hearing.'