Opinion editor's note: Editorials represent the opinions of the Star Tribune Editorial Board, which operates independently from the newsroom.
•••
Violent political rhetoric has become increasingly common in our polarized society, and all too frequently it's spilling over into actual physical violence. Both pose serious threats to our democracy and civilized society.
Last week's outrageous attack on Paul Pelosi, the 82-year-old husband of U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, appears to be another of those manifestations. The alleged attacker, David DePape, 42, entered the Pelosi home carrying zip ties and duct tape and demanded to know where Nancy Pelosi was before attacking her husband with a hammer.
DePape had posted memes and conspiracy theories on social media about the 2020 election, the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and COVID vaccines, according to authorities. After entering the home, San Francisco police say they saw DePape "violently assault" Paul Pelosi with a hammer before they were able to tackle him.
In a disturbing complaint filed Monday, authorities said DePape told them he intended to hold Nancy Pelosi hostage and "break her kneecaps" to show other members of Congress there were consequences for their actions, the Associated Press reported.
More and more, there are individuals who, for whatever reason, feel they must go further and further to signal their displeasure with an elected official or group or stand on an issue. Witness the scaffolding Jan. 6 insurrectionists erected while chanting "Hang Mike Pence," and the repeated threats against election workers across the country.
The attack by DePape has raised concerns about whether lawmakers and their families should have more security when they are under threat. But the real problem is the threats themselves. We must be able to distinguish between freedom of speech and the kind of bullying and intimidating behavior that can pave the way for actual violence.